Episode 1: RoMKnee 2012
Part 1
- Purpose:
- To educate the community (enable smashers to keep current)
- To focus discussion and consolidate attention (help generate hype)
- To facilitate communication regarding decisions that affect the community
- To improve general knowledge sharing within the community
- Format
- Intro to the show
- Shoutouts / reminder to subscribe to our stuff (twitch / twitter / youtube / etc)
- Summary of agenda
- Would talk about Kings of Cali but too much to cover with RoM
- RoM 5 quick recap
- RoM Controversies
- Action Plan
- What community leaders are doing
- What you (viewers) can do to help
- Rom 5 Recap
- Promotion and attendance
- Day 1
- Chat a bit about day 1 and the venue etc with Prog and Cactuar
- Day 2
- Talk about notable teams and singles happenings
- Call out best sets and direct traffic to vgbootcamp
- Rom 5
- Cool sets
- Day 1 – teams double bowser mm vs cactuar / KK
- Day 2
- “Floating”
- M2K vs Unknown and DSR (modified) – was using DSR(M)
- Cool sets
- DSR Issue
- BF (Unknown)
- FD (M2K)
- FoD (M2K)
- FoD (Unknown)
- Stage 5??? M2K Picks FD? Last stage he won on was FoD
- “Cactuar” Says This:
- DSR Standard
- Cannot go back to any stage you have won on
- DSR Modified
- Cannot go back to the last stage you won on
- DSR Standard
- Button Checking “rules” – proposal
- Testing out a TV for a short amount of time only at the beginning of the set
- “Splitting” – What Happened?
- A lot of extenuating circumstances – stems from a root cause
- Mentality was a really large issue in all 3 sets
- Perhaps can’t be regulated by a “rule” but perhaps a code of conduct can be implemented
Part 2
- What contributed in a bad way
- TOs must make the rules either consistent or clear
- Players must accept responsibility for what’s in their control
- Board Game Rules – if both people played a match or a set then it’s done
- Relationship between players, TO, streamers, viewers, potential viewers / sponsors
- Communication / cooperation issues
- Lack of resources (staff)
- Interests not aligning between interested parties
- Communication / cooperation issues
- TOs are not expected to follow the rules listed
- Enabling motivation (?)
- Facilitate competition vs invading / punishment
- No stakes outside of money in case of splits
- Deconstructing tournaments
- TO – owns the “code of conduct” and the setting of rules
- Need to set this “code” beforehand
- Players – buy into the above “code of conduct” by entering
- Streamers – should agree to the “code of conduct” and trust the TO to execute against it
- TO – owns the “code of conduct” and the setting of rules
- What we can do to address
- Enabling motivation / facilitating competition
- Circuit points
- Power rankings? Underground power rankings?
- ELO / SSBPD – Just for fun!
- TOs and following the rules
- Revise the ruleset
- Code of conduct
- Guide for TOs
- Seeding and how we do it
- Seeding of top “X” – maybe top 16 or so
- No regional matchups in R1, or R2 if it could be avoided
- No one plays people from the same pool (in the first 2 rounds)
- Enabling motivation / facilitating competition
Part 3
- MBR
- History lesson
- Used to be a room where top players discuss strategy and tier lists
- “Old boys club” feel
- Wanted to transition to a structure that gives back to the community
- Created application process to try to identify community leaders
- Have needed more resources to complete projects
- Forum model outdated 🙁
- Not good for “getting things done”
- Move towards social media? Facebook? Reddit?
- Moving to a more accessible discussion center
- We all know what needs to be done, or what we could do
- History lesson
Other Notes:
- RoM 5 controversies
- “Button Checking” –new videos
- Pot splitting
- Timeliness / Disqualifications
- More needed
- DSR Rules (historical vs MBR)
- Stage list
- Extending sets (Best of X)
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.